Untitled Document
Current status of assisted reproduction in Latin America and the world.
 
Accreditaton Visits
In 1997 starts the Accreditation process, with the aim of promoting a better quality to the RED centers and to ensure the accuracy of the data sent to the Registro Latinoamericano de Reproducción Asistida ( RLA ).

Requirements for Accreditation:
Any center that has an interest in joining the RED should :
• Possess current legal person ;
• Comply with the health conditions of their country and requested by RED ;
• Report results to the Registro Latinoamericano de Reproducción Asistida ( RLA ) ;
• Accept to pay the fee for the visit ( USD 1,200 ) .

Stages of the accreditation process :
1. The center should indicate their interest in the belong to RED, requesting to the RED Secretariat ;
2 . Should report their data to the RLA ;
3 . A visit of accreditation , which is held by two accreditors (usually a clinical and a biologist ) , which are chosen from the accredited centers of RED is scheduled . The accreditors must meet the following requirements : have proper training , do not have any relationship with the center who will visit , accept the confidentiality of the information received to the visit and belong to an accredited center of RED ;

During the visit , must attend the Clinical and Laboratory Directors .

 

Points to be evaluated during the accreditation visit :
1. The Assisted Reproduction Laboratory : its facilities, equipment , recording and quality control systems .
Note: the parameters that will be considered are in the Procedures Manual for Assisted Reproduction Laboratory of RED , the Standards for Accreditation and Evaluation Forms - checklist .
2 . Verification of data reported to the RLA ;
3 . Clinical and embryology lab stories ;
4 . ( Duly signed ) informed consent ;
5 . CVs of professionals of the center ;
6 . Center efficiency ;
7 . The manual of procedures (clinical and laboratory ) ;
8 . All documentation to back up the questions marked with &  in the Questionnaire ( Checklist ) .

IMPORTANT CLARIFICATION :
When asked by the existence of criteria protocols , controls , etc. . , one must understand that we request are written or documented and are shown as the accrediting requests . The corresponding questions marked with the symbol & documentation should always be shown . Other evidence ( certification of instruments , bioassays of commercial media , etc. . ) Should be shown as the accreditor requests . After completing the questionnaire should be signed by the Cliical and Laboratory Directors . In the event that a question does not apply to the Centre , should be explained in the same place the questionnaire , giving the reasons for which do not apply . These questions will be deducted from the total at the time of establishing the percentage of appropriate responses.

Review:
Classification of questions : There are four types of questions :
Category 1 : ESSENTIAL
Category 2 : VERY IMPORTANT
Category 3 : IMPORTANT
Category 4 : SUGGESTED

To get your ACCREDITATION , the center must comply with : 95 to 100 % of the questions Category 1 (for them who performs procedures ) and 75 % of Category 2 questions . If a center accumulates 85-94 % adequate responses to questions from Category 1 and 75% fulfilled Category 2 responses to questions , receive conditional approval , with a maturity of 1 year to resolve bankruptcies found . At the end of this period , the Accreditation Committee will evaluate the changes made by the center and will make its recommendation to the Board of Directors .

To get your ASSOCIATION , the center must meet : 76-84 % of responses to questions from Category 1 and 75 % of Category 2 responses to questions .
If a center accumulates 70-75 % of questions completed Category 1 responses and 50 % of responses to questions from Category 2 , receive a CONDITIONAL ASSOCIATION , with a maturity of 1 year to resolve bankruptcies found . At the end of this period , the Accreditation Committee will evaluate the changes made by the center and will make its recommendation to the Board of Directors . The data reported by these centers will not be incorporated into the Registro Latinoamericano de Reproducción Asistida report.

If the center doesn’t get the number of acceptable answers , will be REFUSED .

Evaluation process - after you have received the visit:
The accreditors report the results directly to the Accreditation Committee and perform your comments and suggestions about the centers visited . To make this decision , the Committee is based on accreditation standards , evaluation forms ( Checklist ) and comments that accreditors perform after the visits . The Committee presents its decision to the Board of Directors (BD ) and this makes the final decision .

Result:
A center may result Accredited ( socio activo ) , associated ( socio suscriptor ) or refused. After visited, each center receives a letter with the suggestions made ​​by accreditors . These suggestions are intended to improve the quality of care for each center to their patients .
The resulting associated centers may maintain this condition for a period of three years , when they will be revisited . Also , those centers that were refused , will be invited to participate again , once they have made ​​the suggested changes .

DOWNLOADS

Accreditation Standards  (in Spanish)
Evaluation Questionnaires (in Spanish)

     
 
Untitled Document
Accreditation
Reaccreditation
Accreditation Committee
Documents
 
Home
Restrict Area
Who we Are
Register
Accreditation
Pec Online
Conferences
Publications
FAQ
Fórum
Contact Us
 
 
In this section you´ll find information about the accredited and affiliated centres that belong to the Latin American Network of Assisted Reproduction.